Improve Your Search Engine Ranking By 15% Or More With This Brand New Software That Uses A Comprehensive Statistical Analysis Of Thousands Of High Ranking Sites.

Over five years ago, I performed my first statistical analysis of the major search engine. Two years ago, the results were released to just over 100 people who paid $10,000 each and signed strict non-disclosure agreements. Those agreements have now expired.

I know using software to statistically analyze the search engines and actually find out how they rank sites sounds too good to be true... but you're going to have to trust me on this because you will hate yourself for missing out on this if you pass it up.

Don't let that happen. To help you out, I'll give you some concise, quick, valuable advice:

If You've Got $53 You Can Invest In the "Coolest" New Software Available To Increase Your Search Engine Ranking Dramatically... Drop What You're Doing Right Now and Devour Every Word of This Letter....

I Promise You Will Not Regret it - You Have My Word On It...

Greetings Marketing Professional,

Have you hung out on the search engine ranking forums before? Boy; I did. It was several years ago, but I still remember how pissed off I was when I realized I had wasted over a year of my life trying to learn something from a bunch of imbeciles who claimed to know something about search engine ranking.

Here's how my journey began. I was working in a pretty cool place, ThermoGenesis. We developed medical equipment and my main job was as a software developer. I enjoyed that, but what I enjoyed even more was working on the actual research just like I was a PhD in Hematology (the study of blood).

I was allowed to do that because the top level management of this company had just been replaced. The new President of the company was a guy I had worked for at a prior job (Baxter Microscan... now called Dade Microscan). He had been the Vice President of Research and Development at my old job. He knew my abilities. He even knew that I'm a High School drop out. (He was a Ph.D.)

You see, my entire career has been spent using statistical analysis and software to either reverse engineer something (like Top Secret military equipment of other countries) or reverse engineering the human body in some way. My skills were unique. The problem the Hematologists were trying to solve had been studied and researched ever since World War II. It needed a fresh approach.

Well, I really dug that. I took on the challenge of solving a problem that a ton of Ph.D. medical doctors and researchers had completely failed at for over 50 years. And I solved the problem using the skills I had picked up during my prior projects. I did things my way and that was fine with the president of the company because I got results. Even though I had done some other pretty cool things with statistical analysis and programming, I earned my first two patents and what I discovered saves lives every day.

(You can check out the patents on USPTO.gov. It is easiest to search for "Jim" and "Brausch" in the Inventor Name field. You can also type in the patent numbers. They are: 6,472,162 and 6,274,090. You will see a lot of inventors listed for each. That's mostly formality. That first patent is really my invention. The second patent is really Phil Kingsley's invention. Dr. Gail Rock had nothing to do with either invention. She was a consultant "a real hematologist" and they put her name on the patent to give it credibility (remember, I'm not a Ph.D. in anything... much less hematology). Phil Coehlo and James Godsey were the C.E.O and President of the company. Their names went on everything. Trista and Sona were my lab assistants. They just carried out the protocols I created. Phil Kingsley is a talented mechanical engineer and did invent the aparatus that was required to market the method I came up with in the first patent. So... although you see a bunch of names on both of those patents... the fact is that the first one is my invention and the second one is the invention of Phil Kingsley.)

What does all of that have to do with search engine ranking? Well, what I'm about to tell you is very controversial and no-one else even claims to have done the research I'm going to share with you. I need you to understand why that has happened. There aren't many people in the world who are high school drop-outs who have been able to solve a problem that hundreds of doctors trained in that field weren't able to solve. Similarly, the field of Search Engine Ranking Reverse Engineering simply doesn't exist. There isn't anyone else out there qualified to call my research rubbish like there was in the field of hemotology. However, what I'm about to tell you is proven research. Just like those patents actually save lives every day... even though a trained hematologist didn't invent them... The research I'm about to disclose actually increases the ranking of your sites even though Ph.D. trained researchers in Search Engine Ranking Reverse Engineering can't give it their blessing (even if such a Ph.D. actually existed).

OK; so on with my story. I really dug being able to solve problems like those patents with my unique skills. However, I didn't like working for someone else. Who does? I worked with a bunch of geniuses (yeah; actual Mensa society type people... and yes; I have one of those IQs too). These geniuses specialized in electrical and mechanical engineering while I focused on statistics and software engineering. These geniuses didn't like working for someone else either. We decided to start our own company along with a marketing guy who worked for ThermoGenesis who also wanted out.

I'm sure you can identify with that. If you are interested in getting your site ranked higher in the search engines, then I'm guessing you are a fellow entrepreneur and want to run your own show too.

Well; we did it. The mechanical and electrical engineer came up with a really cool product. It was about 2 1/2 inches long and it fit inside the barrel of an unloaded pistol. You could then dry-fire that pistol and a 20 millisecond laser would blip on the target and show you where you would have hit if you would have actually fired that pistol.

I worked on the target to go along with it. You would hook this target up to the USB port on your computer and dry-fire the pistol at it and it would keep track of your accuracy. After playing with it for just a couple of days, any of us could quick draw a pistol from a holster and shoot a fly on a fence at 50 feet. It was so cool that we thought every police and military organization in the world would buy a hundred each.

Well; maybe they will some day. It turned out that our marketing guy was a real loser. The geniuses lost interest and slowly dropped out of the company. In the end, it was just me.

The luster of owning my own business started to dull on me too. I was spending a ton of time marketing (mostly trade shows), constantly battling the manufacturing house trying to get problems fixed in the manufacturing process, answering customer service questions and dealing with credit card chargebacks. I even got one from the police chief of the capital of a major European country. What a scum bag! He refused to return the product (he really liked it), but he didn't want to pay for it.

I finally decided that I would have to sell this thing on the Internet if at all to get rid of the marketing issue. Every weekend at a trade show was just too much work.

So I started my Internet journey. I really wasn't a newbie. I had been around the Internet since before there was a World Wide Web. I remember Yahoo having 17 sites. I remember Jon Postel. I remember when domain name registration was free.

I knew that the Internet was an information treasure. Anything I needed to learn about marketing on the Internet, I could learn on the Internet; right? Wrong!

I put up my web-site and started buying traffic from every source on the Internet at the time. It seems like one of them was called Flycast and there were a ton of banner exchanges and banner networks. Most advertising was sold on a CPM basis back then. I don't think ANY of those companies are still around.

I failed miserably. I never found a single traffic source that made a net profit. Today, I understand that I needed to work on my sales copy. Back then, I only understood that I needed to get free traffic to my website.

Have you been there?

There were dozens of search engines back then (Lycos was my favorite). I joined all of the discussion lists and forums about search engine optimization and soaked up everything for over a year. Dang; it just pisses me off how stupid I was to hang out with those people for that long without opening my eyes.

Finally, I did open my eyes though. I was staring at a thread that talked about dashes in domains. One group was animate that you needed to separate your keywords with dashes in your domain for highest ranking... because the search engines couldn't read your keywords if they were all run together. The other group was animate that dashes in domains were penalized by the search engines.

My dealings with the Ph.D. types came back to me. I started to ask the people in these forums how they did their research. Most simply avoided my questions. Some babbled about doing split tests (which simply isn't possible since there is only one Internet and only one of each search engine under study). Then it finally came to me as a shock. None of these bozos had done any research! They were just the blind leading the blind!

Man; was I pissed. I was so pissed that I sat down and wrote a program in one session... 32 hours straight. My program queried each major search engine thousands of times for different search phrases. It then systematically tallied all of the domains at the #1 ranking for over 1,000 questions (including the dashes question). It did the same for ranking #2 and so on for the first 10 rankings. It then compared #1 to #2 and #1 to #3 and #2 to #3 and so on until ranking correlations could be determined.

This was child's play to me. In the past, I had done the same thing with aspects of the human body (blood plasma proteins) and before that with satelite chips from other country's military and before that with other much more complicated things than search engines.

After 32 hours, I had the answer to the thread that had been started about dashes. I posted it and was ridiculed. I called this dataset the SERF1 dataset. SERF stands for "Search Engine Ranking Factors." The SERF1 dataset deals with all URL factors. It answers questions about ranking correlations with domain names and the rest of URLs.

Another couple of days later, I had retrieved the pages associated with all of those ranked sites and had analyzed some on-page factors. I called this the SERF2 dataset. This dataset deals with all of the on-page factors (title tags, heading tags, metatags, keyword density, page length, etc.)

Two weeks after that, I had downloaded all of the pages that linked to the ranked pages and had analyzed them with yet another program. I called this the SERF3 dataset. This dataset answers all of the questions about inbound links.

I then ran a predictive analysis to see how valuable (how complete) my datasets were. I also wanted to get the weightings of these three datasets... How much of each one mattered. I was astonished.

Here's one piece of data that I'm going to give you for free. Have you heard the modern day blind SEOs telling everyone that inbound links are everything? That on-page factors really mean nothing with the leading search engine? Do you even hear them make any claims whatsoever about URL factors?

Well; the numbers vary from month-to-month, but if you round them out to the nearest 10%, there hasn't been much change with the leading search engine in the last three years. Here is how those factors actually weight:

URL Factors (SERF1): 20%

On Page Factors (SERF2): 40%

Link Factors (SERF3): 40%

How does that compare to what the current SEO "experts" tell you? I don't hang out in those forums anymore, but I hear they are preaching only the religion of inbound links. That turns out to be only 40% of the equation!

OK; back to my story. I put this data to use. I built sites about military, police, guns, air guns, paintball and hunting. I built them using the data for each major search engine at the time. I built several of each of those sites, each optimized for a single search engine.

Guess what happened? Of course. I got #1 on every single search engine for those major keywords!

I tried to go back to the forums and help out the newbies with the data. I was ridiculed. I posted my sites and their rankings in order to earn the credibility. They still ridiculed me. You can do some searches and still find some of those threads.

Worse than the ridicule, most of my sites disappeared from the rankings. I had embarassed the search engines and I had done it publicly. I was justly punished. Lesson learned. You need to learn that lesson too. Once you get this tool, don't brag about your site's ranking on a public forum. It will get banned.

Much has happened since that time. There actually are people who have discovered some of this data in spotty and half-hazard ways. Much of the data has also been leaked by those 100 people who signed non-disclosure agreements, but didn't keep their word.

Before you get your hopes up, I'm not going to sell all of those tools and data. In fact, there are decent link tools out there now. Since there are tons of tools available for that, I'm not going to join the "me too" crowd on link data.

That leaves the on-page data and the URL data. I might eventually sell the on-page data, but not today. Nemeas is a tool to deal with that 20% of the ranking algorithm on the major search engine that everyone ignores.

And I'm not even selling that data. You wouldn't want it anyways (unless you wanted to create a competing tool). What you really want and need is a tool that scores your domains and URLs for ranking correlation.

Imagine this... You want to start a new site about cooking. You haven't picked out a domain yet, but you have read this letter... so you know that your domain and URL actually contribute about 20% of your search engine ranking. So, you want to choose the very best domain name.

OK; no problem. That's what Nemeas will do for you. You create a list of potential domain names and click the "Score" button. It will evaluate those domain names against over 1,000 factors and give you a simple score for each domain. The higher the score, the more that domain is similar to higher ranking domains and less like lower ranking domains.

Pretty cool; huh? But wait... that's not all!

Once you choose your domain name, you need to know how to structure your site so that all of the URLs for each page of your site are optimized for highest ranking; right? No problem. Nemeas does that for you too. You just list all of the options you can think of for URLs and click the "score" button. It scores full URLs too!.

How's that? You choose the highest scoring domain and the highest scoring URLs for the pages of your site and you instantly get a 20% "edge" over your competition when it comes to ranking.

I claimed 15% in the headline, because the amount of edge varies as the major search engine changes it's algorithm. I've never seen it below 16% though. As I write this, the URL weightings amount to about 22% of the ranking factors.

Nemeas is extremely simple to use. Here is a screen shot of the software:

Put your list of domains and URLs in the input file (we'll show you how to do this in videos you can watch on your PC).

Once you do that, you click the "Score" button. In milliseconds, all of your domains and URLs are scored and you are presented with a list of them along with their score to the right of each one.

Choose the highest scoring and you are well on your way to having 15% or higher rankings than if you ignore this letter and don't use Nemeas.

Will a higher scoring URL always perform better than a lower scoring URL? No; of course not. This is just a statistical analysis of about 20% of the search engine ranking factors. You still need to get inbound links. You still need to have on page factors optimized. But this does give you an edge over the competition if all other factors are equal.

Here's my guarantee:

So; I take all of the risk. Think of this as a free trial. Get Nemeas and try it out for a full 60 days. Then get your money back if you want. The risk is all mine.

So lets recap. The cost is $53 for Nemeas. You get the software that has the database built in of high and low ranking domains and URLs. The software simply boils down your list of domains or URLs into a simple score showing you how much your URL is similar to high ranking pages and different from low ranking pages.

You'll be able to install it immediately after you order. Since the data is built in, you can score your first URLs just seconds after you install it. It's as simple as typing in a list of URLs clicking the score button. You have 60 days to use it and score as many URLs as you want and still get a refund if you don't like it. This is a no-brainer; right?

I hope you weren't expecting me to include dozens of "free" bonuses and postscripts and tell you that you can only order it at this price today. Yuck! I hate that crap. I'm a bit of a rebel from the normal crowd. I like to just tell it like it is and let you decide. You have the facts. We agree that you need the very highest ranking to get the very most traffic from the search engines; right? You know you can get your money back if you don't like it; right? OK; so I've been long-winded enough. Now; it's your turn to take action. Go ahead and click that "Order Nemeas Software" link below and get started on the road to more earnings right now!

Go ahead! There isn't anything else. There aren't going to be any P.S. and P.P.S. messages. There is no list of weird free bonuses. So, click it and place your order already.

System Requirements: Windows XP.